MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038829588 · doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0266

Real-Time Tele-echocardiography: Diagnosis and Management of a Pericardial Effusion Secondary to Pericarditis at an Antarctic Research Station

2012· article· en· W2038829588 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Otto, Ronald Shemenski, Laura M. Drudi

Bibliographic record

VenueTelemedicine Journal and e-Health · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsTelehealthPericardial effusionMedical emergencyMedicinePericarditisTelemedicineHealth careSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The McMurdo Research Station medical facility functions at the level of a rural community hospital emergency department. Telehealth technology has played an increasingly important role in providing intercontinental tertiary healthcare consultations, particularly for assistance with diagnostically challenging cases or cases involving complicated medical management. The role of telehealth in Antarctica is vital given the harsh and remote environment. The following case discusses a real-time tele-ultrasound consultation between the station physician and a patient with pericarditis at the McMurdo Medical Clinic in Antarctica and a team of cardiology consultants at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. The use of teleheath technologies prevented an unnecessary intercontinental medical evacuation and allowed the patient to receive treatment at the McMurdo Research Station. This case report demonstrates that real-time tele-ultrasound can serve as an important diagnostic resource in the delivery of healthcare to isolated populations in remote environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelemedicine Journal and e-HealthSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207