MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2038831914 · doi:10.1115/smasis2009-1322

Artificial Muscle Membranes Fabricated Using Ultra-Short Pulse Laser Ablation

2009· article· en· W2038831914 on OpenAlexaff
Iain A. Anderson, Benjamin O’Brien, Tiberius Brastivaceanu, Gregory J. R. Spooner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersTertiary Education Commission
KeywordsMaterials scienceDielectricAblationActuatorMembraneCapacitorLaserComposite materialArtificial muscleLaser ablationElectrodePolymerVoltageDielectric strengthOptoelectronicsOpticsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Ultra Short Pulse (USP) laser has been used for surface milling of dielectric elastomer actuator (DEA) polymer (3M VHB tape). DEA’s, artificial analogues to natural muscle, act as flexible capacitors and consist of a polymeric dielectric membrane material sandwiched between flexible electrodes. Actuation is in part determined by the voltage difference across the electrodes and the dielectric membrane thickness. Prior to the present report, pre-stretching the membrane provided the sole means for controlling membrane thickness. Good quality ablation, without grossly observable thermal damage, was achieved at removal rates of 0.0047 mm3/s using a 250 kHz repetition rate and an energy delivery of 2 μjoules/pulse. The surface milling operation was performed as a set of parallel passes produced a series of small shallow trenches, the result of overlap between subsequent passes of the laser. These features did not significantly compromise performance of the test actuators and the USP machined polymer could be pre-stretched at least five times the original size without rupture. When placed in a support frame and subjected to high electric field strength the stretched membrane also maintained its relatively high breakdown strength. A proof of concept two-thickness actuator, one half of it milled, was produced and successfully actuated. USP laser processing has provided a design freedom, beyond pre-stretching, and has opened the way to novel variable thickness micro-actuators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→