MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acute vaginal candidosis model in the immunocompromized rat to evaluate delivery systems for antimycotics Modell der akuten Vaginalcandidose bei immunsupprimierten Ratten zur Bewertung lokaler antimykotischer Chemotherapie

2000· article· de· W2038848214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMycoses · 2000
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal HealthUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosuppressionCandida albicansCyclophosphamideAntifungalMedicineMycosisImmunologyMicrobiologyBiologyDermatologyChemotherapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rat model of vaginal candidosis, suitable for screening new antifungal compounds or novel formulations was developed and validated. Two strains of Candida albicans, different inoculation schedules, quantitative assays for fungal burden and the necessity for immunosuppression were tested. The infection was evaluated clinically and histologically by fungal counts from the vaginal discharge. The animals without immunosuppression did not sustain the infection beyond 2-3 days, however, after immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide, the infection can be maintained for about 2 weeks and is suitable for the testing of topical antifungal therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it