MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction: Peacebuilding and Reconstruction in Haiti

2011· article· en· W2038854972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Peacebuilding & Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPeacebuilding and International Security
Canadian institutionsGlobal Affairs CanadaInternational Development Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeacebuildingTransformative learningContext (archaeology)Dimension (graph theory)Political scienceSociologySocial justiceEconomic JusticeEpistemologyPublic administrationPolitical economyLawGeographyPhilosophyArchaeologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of ‘peacebuilding’ has been widely discredited in Haiti due to the application of an orthodox liberal approach in the 1990s and the limits of stabilisation since 2004. Revitalising ‘ refondation’, the transformative dimension of post-earthquake reconstruction, could connect that project to a more context-relevant concept of peacebuilding and especially to endogenous struggles for social justice. Drawing on critical constructivist theory and on the other contributions to this special issue, this introductory article suggests that there are possibilities to build the social basis for such changes, despite the alignment of forces in Haiti today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it