MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038879036 · doi:10.1142/s021988780900359x

ISOMETRIES IN HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL CCNV SPACETIMES

2009· article· en· W2038879036 on OpenAlexaff
D. D. McNutt, A. A. Coley, Nicos Pelavas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Differential Geometry Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometry (Riemannian geometry)PhysicsMetric (unit)Isometry groupKilling vector fieldConstant (computer programming)Translation (biology)Constant curvatureMathematical physicsCurvatureNull (SQL)Pure mathematicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the class of higher-dimensional Kundt metrics admitting a covariantly constant null vector, known as CCNV spacetimes. We pay particular attention to those CCNV spacetimes with constant (polynomial) curvature invariants (CSI). We investigate the existence of an additional isometry in CCNV spacetimes, by studying the Killing equations for the general form of the CCNV metric. In particular, we list all CCNV spacetimes allowing an additional non-spacelike isometry for all values of the light-cone coordinate v, which are of interest due to the invariance of the metric under a translation in v. As an application we use our results to find all CSICCNV spacetimes with an additional isometry as well as the subset of these spacetimes in which the isometry is non-spacelike for all values v.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Differential Geometry ResearchFrench-language works237,207