MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038882376 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2014.7094517

A hierarchy of cognitive brain networks revealed by multivariate performance metrics

2014· article· en· W2038882376 on OpenAlex
Stephen C. Strother, Saman Sarraf, Cheryl L. Grady

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2014 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisMultivariate statisticsPattern recognition (psychology)DiscriminantArtificial intelligencePlot (graphics)Computer scienceVariance (accounting)HierarchyLinear discriminant analysisMathematicsStatisticsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To evaluate discriminant models in fMRI data we introduce the pseudo-Receiver Operating Characteristic plot defined by subsampled, spit-half measures of prediction (P) versus spatial pattern reproducibility (R). We illustrate (P, R) plots using denoised fMRI data with 10%-100% of the components from a 1 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">st</sup> -level principal component analysis (PCA). An LD model is then regularized in split-half subsamples with 2 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> -level PCAs that retain Q PCs from the largest to smaller variance. We show that the resulting Z-scored, LD spatial maps with monotonically increasing P and Q reflect regionally-dependent hierarchies of underlying brain-networks adapted to meet particular task demands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it