MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038885515 · doi:10.4043/23714-ms

Petermann Ice Island 'A' Survey Results, Offshore Labrador

2012· article· en· W2038885515 on OpenAlexaffabout
E. Julie Halliday, Tony King, Pradeep Bobby, Luke Copland, Derek Mueller

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton UniversityCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubmarine pipelineGlacierIcebergBayOceanographyIce capsGround-penetrating radarSea iceGeomorphologyRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In August 2010 a 265 km2 ice island calved from the Petermann Glacier innorthern Greenland. Soon after the initial calving event the mass broke intoseveral pieces, some of which exited Baffin Bay and drifted south toward theLabrador coast. By June 2011 PII-A, a large fragment of the initial PetermannIce Island, was situated offshore Labrador and in one week it had moved 225 kmdown the coast. Concern arose that if PII-A continued its trajectory it couldreach the Grand Banks by August 2011, posing a potential risk for existinginfrastructure in the offshore region of Newfoundland. To properly assess thepotential risk a realistic estimate of ice mass was necessary. This in turnrequired field measurements of the ice islands thickness. A three-day field program was carried out on the Petermann Ice Islands, PII-A and PII-A-a, from June 17–19, 2011. At this time PII-A and PII-A-a weresituated offshore Labrador, Canada, approximately 100 km northeast of the townof Rigolet. Geophysical survey methods, including Ground Penetrating Radar(GPR) and Seismic Reflection, were used to identify the base of the islands andobtain ice thickness measurements at various locations. Eight satellitetracking beacons were deployed on PII-A and one was deployed on PII-A-a. Ablation data, photographs and video footage were also obtained during theprogram. On July 22, 2011, PII-A was revisited while it was situated off thesouthern Labrador coast. GPR measurements were acquired at the pre-existingstations; the measurements allowed for deterioration rates due to surface andbasal melting to be calculated for PII-A. Results of the field measurementsindicate that ice thickness varied between 50 to 80 m on PII-A; the thicknessof PII-A-a was 30 m at a single survey location. Surface melt rates of 2.7–6.3cm day-1 were observed over a 1-day period in June. For the 35-day periodbetween June and July visits, average surface and basal melt of 5.0 cm day-1and 3.4 cm day-1, respectively, were calculated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207