MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kindling suppresses primed-burst-induced long-term potentiation in hippocampal CA1

2003· article· en· W2038913711 on OpenAlexaff
L. Stan Leung, Chiping Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLong-term potentiationHippocampal formationNeuroscienceKindlingHippocampusPsychologyBiologyEpilepsyMedicineInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a previous study, we showed that partial hippocampal kindling in rats, a model of temporal lobe epilepsy, reduced the efficacy of presynaptic GABA(B) receptors in the CA1 area of hippocampal slices. In this study, we show that long-term potentiation (LTP) induced by theta-frequency primed bursts was suppressed in kindled as compared to control rats, but not in the presence of the GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP35348 or CGP55845A. This is original evidence that LTP is suppressed by pathophysiological downregulation of GABA(B) autoreceptors. Control of postsynaptic inhibition by presynaptic GABA(B) receptors may provide a compensatory mechanism for controlling paroxysmal activity, with a side effect of blocking synaptic plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207