MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2038968796 · doi:10.1121/1.4782887

Localization of killer whale mother, juvenile, and calf vocalizations.

2008· article· en· W2038968796 on OpenAlexaff
Dawn M. Grebner, David L. Bradley, Dean E. Capone, Susan E. Parks, Jennifer Miksis‐Olds, John K. B. Ford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuvenileWhaleSound productionVocal communicationAcousticsAssociation (psychology)HydrophoneBiologyCommunicationEcologyPsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dataset of killer whale female (mother), juvenile, and calf vocalizations was collected with a hydrophone array in Johnstone Strait in the summers of 2006 and 2007. The vocalizations were spatially and temporally localized together with behavioral observations. The analysis is focused on pulsed call production variation when a mother is with her juvenile(s) and/or calf and when she is separated from one or more of them. Analysis is centered on the frequency-time structure of the vocalizations. This circumstance provides a unique opportunity to gain insight into the communication between individuals within a common social subset of a matriline or pod. This subset is characteristically tighter in association than many other intramatrilineal groups and can offer a glimpse into early vocal exchange and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→