MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038981691 · doi:10.2523/iptc-17202-ms

Estimation of the Relative Contributions of Different Hydrocarbon Charges to the Sw Qaidam Basin Accumulations Using Micro-Spectroscopy Analysis of Petroleum Inclusions

2013· article· en· W2038981691 on OpenAlexaff
Lily Gui, Shaobo Liu, Keyu Liu, Yi Zhao, Meng Qingyang, Jiaqing Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid inclusionsHydrocarbonMaturity (psychological)API gravityGeologyPetroleumInclusion (mineral)QuartzMineralogyGeochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a series of paper, the characteristics of petroleum inclusions described by ?max from the UV and CH2/CH3 ratio from the FT-IR spectra. On the basis of optical microscopic, microthermometric, fluorescence spectroscopic and FT-IR spectroscopic analyses three types of hydrocarbon inclusions are identified in the study area: namely yellow fluorescencing oil inclusions,blue fluorescencing oil inclusions andgas inclusions, representing two episodes of oil charges and one gas charge possibly related to readjustment of the associated gases down dip. The first episode of oil charge is represented by the predominantly yellow fluorescencing oil inclusions trapped prior to the quartz overgrowth, whereas the second episode is marked by the blue fluorescencing fluid inclusions occurred after the precipitation of dolomite. Both the UV fluorescence and the FT-IR spectra show two distinct oil inclusion groups (yellow and blue) with ?max at 540 nm and 475 nm, respectively and corresponding CH2/CH3 ratios of 1.2 and 2.3, respectively. Microthermometric data indicate that the two groups of oil inclusions have different homogenisation temperatures (Th), corresponding to oil charge around 25 Ma and 10 Ma, respectively for the Gasi and Hongliuquan oilfields, 10 Ma and 5 Ma, respectively for the Yingdong Oilfield, SW Qaidam Basin. The yellow fluorescencing oil inclusions have relatively low maturity and API gravity compared with the blue fluorescencing ones. The current accumulations in the oilfields have maturity and API gravity similar to that of the yellow fluorescencing inclusions. It is concluded that the earlier hydrocarbon charge is thus the predominant contribution to the current accumulations. Introduction Hydrocarbon inclusions are minute petroleum fluids trapped during reservoir diagenesis [1–6]. They provide pristine compositional information of the hydrocarbons present at the time of charge that may offer important clues for understanding hydrocarbon charge history and reservoir fluid evolution. Hydrocarbon inclusions are currently being extensively used to investigate hydrocarbon charge timing and bulk physio-chemical compositions. Due to the minute amount of the fluids within individual inclusions and the complicated extraction procedure, despite of a number of attempts by various authors, so far there is no reported successful case on differentiating the physio-chemical compositions among individual inclusions that may represent different charges using GCMS. In this paper we report detailed characterisation of individual petroleum inclusions using micro-spectroscopy that recently pioneered by Pradier et al. In a series of paper, the micro-spectroscopic analytical methods include both the UV fluorescence spectroscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy. Parameters derived from the micro-spectroscopy such as ?max from the UV fluorescence spectra and CH2/CH3 ratio from the FT-IR spectra can be used to determine the characteristics of the physio-chemical compositions of individual petroleum inclusions including aromatic content, thermal maturity and API gravities with proper calibrations. The TSF parameter is uesd to describe the feature of oil and hydrocarbon inclusion, the R1 parameter is a ratio between TSF emission intensity at 360nm and 320nm at a Excitation wavelength of 270nm, R has closely related to the API and maturity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207