Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ L'homoparentalité, construction d'une nouvelle figure familiale La famille homosexuelle s'établit de plusieurs manières, reprenant des figures familiales hétérosexuelles déjà connues, comme la famille recomposée, la famille adoptive ou la filiation due aux nouvelles techniques de reproduction. Mais ne représente-t-elle qu'un pas de plus dans l'évolution de la construction familiale occidentale ou signifie-t-elle une coupure avec notre modèle de parenté ? C'est à cette question que j'essaie de répondre, d'une part, en montrant comment les différentes configurations familiales hétérosexuelles respectent toutes le principe fondamental de la filiation occidentale : une seule mère, un seul père. D'autre part, en analysant l'entrée en parenté des familles homosexuelles en France. Chez celles-ci, l'enfant aura plusieurs figures de mères, plusieurs figures de père, les unes ne supposant pas les autres. La pluriparenté devient incontournable. Mots-clés : Cadoret, parenté, filiation, procréation, famille homosexuelle, France
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".