MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039031441 · doi:10.1139/y02-147

Vitamin C lowers blood pressure and alters vascular responsiveness in salt-induced hypertension

2002· article· en· W2039031441 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
RR Ettarh, I.P. Odigie, S. A. Adigun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyBlood pressureVitamin CNitric oxideVasodilationVitaminChemistryAcetylcholineSodiumBlood vesselSodium nitroprussideMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of vitamin C treatment on blood pressure and vascular reactivity in salt-induced hypertension. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a normal rat diet, a high-sodium (8% NaCl) diet, a normal rat diet plus vitamin C treament (100 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)), or a high-sodium diet plus vitamin C treatment for 6 weeks. Salt loading significantly increased blood pressure, which was attenuated by vitamin C treatment. Aortic rings from the different groups were suspended for isometric-tension recording. The contractile response to noradrenaline was significantly increased in the salt-loaded rats. Vitamin C reduced the sensitivity of aortic rings to noradrenaline in rats on normal and high-sodium diets. In noradrenaline-precontracted rings, the relaxation response to acetylcholine, which was attenuated in the salt-loaded rats, was restored by vitamin C treatment. Pretreatment with N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) abolished the enhanced response to acetylcholine caused by vitamin C. The results suggest that the antihypertensive effect of vitamin C is associated with a reduction in vascular sensitivity to noradrenaline and enhancement of endothelium-dependent relaxation due to increased nitric oxide bioavailability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchFrench-language works237,207