MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039052106 · doi:10.1177/0954406211404853

Feature selection for damage degree classification of planetary gearboxes using support vector machine

2011· article· en· W2039052106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature selectionSupport vector machineArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)WeightingBenchmark (surveying)Ranking (information retrieval)Selection (genetic algorithm)Feature extractionClass (philosophy)Data miningMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feature selection is an effective way of improving classification, reducing feature dimension, and speeding up computation. This work studies a reported support vector machine (SVM) based method of feature selection. Our results reveal discrepancies in both its feature ranking and feature selection schemes. Modifications are thus made on which our SVM-based method of feature selection is proposed. Using the weighting fusion technique and the one-against-all approach, our binary model has been extensively updated for multi-class classification problems. Three benchmark datasets are employed to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method. The multi-class model of the proposed method is also used for feature selection in planetary gear damage degree classification. The results of all datasets exhibit the consistently effective classification made possible by the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it