MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039057312 · doi:10.1177/1056492611426481

Sustainable Global Enterprise

2011· article· en· W2039057312 on OpenAlex
Aarti Sharma, Min‐Dong Paul Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management Inquiry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationSustainabilityExtant taxonCorporate social responsibilitySustainable developmentInternational businessBusinessCompetitive advantageCorporate sustainabilityStrategic managementPolitical scienceSociologyEnvironmental ethicsManagementEconomicsPublic relationsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the role of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in sustainable development by drawing on the perspectives of four distinguished management scholars—Stuart Hart, Ans Kolk, Sanjay Sharma, and Sandra Waddock—as well as the extant literature on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and international management. The discussions are centered around “Sustainable Global Enterprise” (SGE)—a new concept coined by Hart. Hart labels those MNEs that can generate competitive strategies that simultaneously deliver economic, social, and environmental benefits for the entire world as SGEs. Through deliberations with the above leading thinkers, this article offers insights into how MNEs can imbue the sustainability principles into their strategic framework and simultaneously contribute to sustainable development. The article also sheds light on the enormous new research opportunities yet to be tapped by international management and sustainability scholars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it