Internal fruit rot caused by<i>Fusarium subglutinans</i>in greenhouse sweet peppers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to isolate the causal organism of internal fruit rot in greenhouse sweet pepper (Capsicum annum), confirm its identity, and elucidate its transmission mode and host range. The effects of inoculum concentration, growth stage of the plant, and cultivar of sweet pepper on disease development were also determined. The causal organism was identified as Fusarium subglutinans. Inoculum concentrations of 104 to 106 conidia/mL resulted in a higher incidence of fruit infection compared with 103 conidia/mL when just-opened and fully opened flowers were inoculated. Inoculation of flowers at different stages with F. subglutinans resulted in more diseased fruits than fruit inoculations. None of the seeds from infected pepper fruits germinated, and 92% of those yielded typical F. subglutinans colonies. No evidence of root infection of pepper plants by F. subglutinans was observed, and no disease developed on fruits of greenhouse tomato, cucumber, or eggplant. Fruits of Capsicum annuum ‘Bison’ and ‘Mazurka’ were less susceptible to F. subglutinans than those of ‘Sympathy’ and ‘444’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".