G Protein-coupled Receptor Endocytosis in ADP-ribosylation Factor 6-depleted Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internalization of G protein-coupled receptors is regulated by several important proteins that act in concert to finely control this complex cellular process. Here, we have applied the RNA interference approach to demonstrate that ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) is essential for the endocytosis of a broad variety of receptors. Reduction of endogenous expression of ARF6 in HEK 293 cells resulted in a correlated inhibition of the beta(2) -adrenergic receptor internalization previously characterized as being sequestered via the clathrin-coated vesicle pathway. Furthermore, other receptors internalizing via this endocytic route, namely the angiotensin type 1 receptor and the vasopressin type 2 receptor, were also impaired in their ability to be sequestered when levels of endogenous ARF6 in cells were reduced. Interestingly, endocytosis of the endothelin type B receptor, characterized as being internalized via the caveolae pathway, was also markedly inhibited in ARF6-depleted cells. In contrast, internalization of the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor was unaffected by reduced levels of ARF6. Finally, internalization of the acetylcholine-muscarinic type 2 receptor via the non-clathrin-coated vesicle pathway was also inhibited in ARF6-depleted cells. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ARF6 proteins play an essential role in the internalization process of most G protein-coupled receptors regardless of the endocytic route being utilized. However, this phenomenon is not general. In some cases, another ARF isoform or other proteins may be essential to regulate the endocytic process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".