MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039087616 · doi:10.1386/ijcm.1.1.5_1

The many ways of community music

2007· article· en· W2039087616 on OpenAlex
Kari Veblen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Community Music · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedVariety (cybernetics)Diversity (politics)PhenomenonPoint (geometry)Closure (psychology)AestheticsEpistemologyRelation (database)SociologyPsychologyCognitive scienceCommunicationComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtPhilosophyAnthropologyArtificial intelligenceMathematicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the concept of community music (CM) from a variety of perspectives and in relation to a wide array of living examples of CM around the world. The author does not seek a definition of CM; she is not aiming for closure. The point of her essay is to emphasize the inherent diversity of CM programmes, their situated natures and the fluidity of this global phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it