MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039096546 · doi:10.1080/14634980802715266

Biodiversity in protected coastal wetlands along the west coast of Lake Huron

2009· article· en· W2039096546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas M. Burton, Donald G Uzarski

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessWetlandMarshBiodiversityInvertebrateMacrophyteEcologySwampEnvironmental scienceGlobal biodiversityGeographyHydrology (agriculture)BiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake Huron protected (barrier-protected) wetlands occur within 1 km of the lake, in swales, interdunal ponds, and other shallow depressions. These wetlands are not directly connected via surface water to Lake Huron, although their hydrology is influenced by lake levels. Biodiversity in them has not been well documented. We compiled plant and animal species occurrence data from published and unpublished sources for the U.S. coast of Lake Huron. Many data sources were reports written by the authors and/or by scientists of the Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Species occurrence data were supplemented with data from published wetlands literature and dissertations and theses. We did not do a thorough compilation for Canadian wetlands and only added limited Canadian data from the “Ontario Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Atlas”. We estimate that total species richness exceeds 1400 species with about an equal number of plants and animals (600–700 species each). We documented the occurrence of 466 macrophytes in Lake Huron’s protected marshes, fens, and swamps and estimated total plant species richness to be > 600. Invertebrate species richness was estimated to be 500–600 with more than half of these being macroinvertebrates (> 0.5 mm) and the remainder being microinvertebrates (< 0.5 mm). Vertebrate species richness was estimated to be > 200 as follows. Fish species richness was estimated to be < 10 because of low oxygen, periodic dry periods, and lack of surface water connection to Lake Huron. Amphibian species richness was estimated to be > 20 with 10 frogs and toads and 7 salamander species documented. Reptile species richness was estimated to be > 20 based on very limited data and published distribution maps with > 10 turtle species and > 10 snake species but no lizards in Lake Huron marshes (although 4–5 lizard species occur on sandy ridges near swale marshes). More than 50 mammal and 80 bird species were estimated to occur in protected wetlands. Occasional additional use by birds and other species combined with the addition of rare species as additional sampling occurs are likely to increase the number of vertebrate species to > 200.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquatic Ecosystem Health & ManagementSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207