MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039111118 · doi:10.1115/icone12-49561

ACR™ Constructability: Increasing Confidence in Project Objectives

2004· article· en· W2039111118 on OpenAlex
Rick Ricciuti, Neville Fairclough, Len Hiebert, Medhat Elgohary, Stephen Yu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue12th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Volume 1 · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructabilityScheduleEngineeringConstruction engineeringFormworkModular programmingPlan (archaeology)Computer scienceSystems engineeringOperations researchCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ACR-700 has been designed with safety, cost and schedule as major drivers. Early in the concept stage it was demonstrated that short construction schedules can be achieved by paralleling activities, using such techniques as extensive modularization, combined with open top construction of the reactor building, as well as using the latest construction techniques available such as climbing formwork, prefabricated rebar, automatic welding, etc. This paper looks at the continued evolution of detailed construction sequences as a planning tool tied to the Primavera schedule. It also looks at examples where cost and schedule become important factors in making engineering decisions associated with the construction method and sequence. Experience on the modularization benefits achieved from the recently completed Qinshan CANDU project is presented. Finally it draws conclusions on the confidence in achieving construction schedules for both the first and nth units of a series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it