MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039132888 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.180404

Calculation of the One- and Two-Loop Lamb Shift for Arbitrary Excited Hydrogenic States

2005· article· en· W2039132888 on OpenAlexaff
Andrzej Czarnecki, Ulrich D. Jentschura, Krzysztof Pachucki

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamb shiftPhysicsExcited stateLoop (graph theory)Quantum electrodynamicsFermionAtomic physicsOrder (exchange)Quantum mechanicsElectronMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General expressions for quantum electrodynamic corrections to the one-loop self-energy [of order $\ensuremath{\alpha}(Z\ensuremath{\alpha}{)}^{6}$] and for the two-loop Lamb shift [of order ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{2}(Z\ensuremath{\alpha}{)}^{6}$] are derived. The latter includes all diagrams with closed fermion loops. The general results are valid for arbitrary excited non-$S$ hydrogenic states and for the normalized Lamb shift difference of $S$ states, defined as ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{n}={n}^{3}\ensuremath{\Delta}E(nS)\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\Delta}E(1S)$. We present numerical results for one-loop and two-loop corrections for excited $S$, $P$, and $D$ states. In particular, the normalized Lamb shift difference of $S$ states is calculated with an uncertainty of order 0.1 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207