MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039172022 · doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00513

Genotypes of chicken major histocompatibility complex B locus associated with regression of Rous sarcoma virus J-strain tumors

2010· article· en· W2039172022 on OpenAlexaff
Ken‐ichiro Suzuki, Toshimi Matsumoto, Eiji Kobayashi, Hirohide Uenishi, И. В. Чуркина, Graham Plastow, Hideji Yamashita, Noriyuki Hamasima, T. Mitsuhashi

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocus (genetics)HaplotypeBiologyMajor histocompatibility complexGeneticsGenotypeGenotypingMHC class IRous sarcoma virusPhenotypeVirusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chicken MHC-B locus affects the response to several strains of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). We evaluated the association between haplotypes of the MHC-B locus and responses to the J strain of RSV by using an F(2) experimental resource family constructed with tumor-regressive (White Leghorn) and tumor-progressive (Rhode Island Red) chickens. The MHC-B haplotypes were determined by genotyping of the microsatellite marker LEI0258 and MHC-B locus class I alpha chain 2 (BF2). Two haplotypes in the resource family, one associated with tumor regression and one with progression, were defined by these 2 markers. To discriminate more precisely the regressive haplotype in this family, we further developed 35 SNP markers at the MHC-B locus. Information on the haplotypes revealed here should be useful for identifying chickens with regression and progression phenotypes of J-strain RSV-induced tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207