MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039198316 · doi:10.1139/b04-049

Induced apogamy in <i>Tmesipteris</i> (Psilotaceae)

2004· article· en· W2039198316 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dean P. Whittier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGametophyteSporophyteBiologyBotanyMeristemFernShoot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gametophytes of Tmesipteris lanceolata Dang., which are mycorrhizal in nature, were grown in axenic culture. If cultured in the light on a nutrient medium containing minerals and 0.5% glucose, they did not become photosynthetic; however, about 15% of them produced apogamous sporophytes with stems and microphylls. The gametophyte–sporophyte junction had a direct connection between the gametophyte and sporophyte tissues and lacked a foot, which is typical for apogamy. Gametangia were limited to the gametophyte portions of these gametophyte–sporophyte growths, and the vascular tissue was present only in the sporophyte regions. The apogamous aerial stems had the normal anatomy for a sporophyte, with vascular tissue, epidermal cells, stomata, and chlorenchyma. The origin of the apogamous sporophytes was different from the origin in fern gametophytes. The Tmesipteris sporophytes arose terminally from the gametophyte apices. It appears that the apical meristem of the gametophyte is converted to a shoot apical meristem to form the apogamous aerial shoot.Key words: Tmesipteris, Psilotaceae, apogamy, sporophyte, gametophyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207