MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039214660 · doi:10.1532/lh96.04048

Effect of Activated Recombinant Human Factor 7 (Niastase) on Laboratory Testing of Inhibitors of Factors VIII and IX

2005· article· en· W2039214660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboratory Hematology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartial thromboplastin timeProthrombin timeMedicineRecombinant factor VIIaTissue factorCoagulationPharmacologyFactor IXThromboplastinRecombinant DNACoagulation testingTiterChemistryInternal medicineImmunologyBiochemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activated recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa) has been used as a hemostatic agent in patients with hemophilia and acquired inhibitors. Other indications for rFVIIa may include liver disease, warfarin sodium (Coumadin) overdose, or trauma. Monitoring patients on this treatment with standard laboratory testing is problematic. Bleeding risk does not correlate well with the prothrombin time (PT) or the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) during therapy with rFVIIa. In addition, there is no identifiable literature on the effect of rFVIIa on assays of inhibitors in this patient group. Monitoring inhibitors may be important during interventions aimed at acutely reducing inhibitor levels, such as during plasma exchange or protein adsorption. We performed factor assays and evaluated inhibitor levels in plasma from 3 patients with deficiencies in FVIII (2 patients) or FIX (1 patient) and inhibitors (titer range, 5.8-17.4 Bethesda units) before and after adding rFVIIa (range, 0.25-8 microg/mL) in vitro. Additionally, we performed assays of factors of both intrinsic and extrinsic systems to determine the impact of rFVIIa on these tests. We found that both factor levels and inhibitor titers from patients with hemophilia A or B could be measured accurately, even in the presence of suprapharmacologic doses of rFVIIa (8 microg/mL). We also obtained accurate measurements for other assays of the intrinsic coagulation system (FXI and FXII) based on the aPTT. Conversely, we found that assays of the extrinsic system based on the PT (FII, FV, and FX) produced results that were unreliable. FVII results were very high but reproducible. These results suggest that assays based on the PT are inaccurate and should be avoided during FVIIa treatment. Conversely, FVIII and FIX levels and inhibitor titers can be accurately monitored in hemophilia patients receiving rFVIIa according to results of aPTT-based coagulation tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it