MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039228055 · doi:10.1094/pdis-92-11-1586b

Occurrence of Potato Tuber Necrotic Isolates of <i>Potato virus Y</i> in a Commercial Tobacco Field in Southern Ontario, Canada

2008· article· en· W2039228055 on OpenAlexaffabout
Huimin Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotato virus YBiologyVirologyNicotiana tabacumPotyviridaePotyvirusTobacco etch virusTobacco mosaic virusSerologyPotato virus XVirusPlant virusGeneAntibodyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most strains of Potato virus Y (PVY) can infect tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum) and cause vein clearing followed by leaf mottling, except the PVYN strain, which induces severe vein necrosis. Some isolates within the PVYN strain also cause potato necrotic tuber ringspot disease, but these have not been reported from Canadian tobacco fields. PVYNTN isolates include European (EU) and North American (NA) types that are serologically identical to PVYN, but can be distinguished by nucleic acid-based assays and potato bioassay (1,2). Some PVY isolates, PVYN-Wi or PVYN:O, resulting from a recombination between RNA molecules of PVYN and the common strain, PVYO, are identified as PVYO in serological assays, but induce necrosis in tobacco (2). In August of 2007, two samples of tobacco (N. tabacum, unknown cultivar) leaves showing necrotic symptoms resembling those induced by PVYN, PVYNTN, or PVYN-Wi were collected from a tobacco field in southern Ontario, Canada and submitted to the Charlottetown Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Charlottetown, PE. Virus in both samples (PVY-204 and PVY-205) reacted with PVYN-specific antibodies 1F5 and 4E7 (3) and induced vein necrosis in tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Samsun). A multiplex reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay (1) for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of various PVY strains amplified two fragments (181 and 452 bp) associated with EU-PVYNTN isolates. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis targeting the P1 and NIb gene (3) also indicated that PVY-204 and PVY-205 were EU-PVYNTN isolates. Known isolates of PVYO, PVYN, and NA-PVYNTN were used in all evaluations as references (3). Furthermore, the nucleotide sequences of the P1 and NIb genes of PVY-204 and PVY-205 determined by automated cycle sequencing (3) and subjected to phylogenetic analysis indicated that the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of both isolates were 96 and 95% identical, respectively, to NA-PVYNTN isolates reported from Canada, but 99% identical (both nucleotide and amino acid) to EU-PVYNTN isolates from Europe and Mexico (3). Potato (cv. Yukon Gold) plants mechanically inoculated with leaf sap from tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Samsun) infected with PVY-204 and PVY-205 developed various leaf symptoms including severe local and systemic necrotic lesions, leaf wilting, and leaf death in 3 to 5 weeks postinoculation under greenhouse conditions. The infected plants recovered in 5 to 6 weeks. Potato (cv. Yukon Gold) plants inoculated with leaf sap from tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Samsun) infected with a PVYNTN isolate (HX8) (3) and healthy tobacco leaf sap were used as positive and negative controls. The number and yield of the tubers harvested from infected plants were significantly reduced (50%), and PVY-204 and PVY-205 induced typical potato tuber necrotic ringspot disease in 52.6% of the progeny tubers with an average disease index of 0.364 (C. Kerlan and K. Charlet-Ramage, EAPR Virology Meeting Proceedings, 1998). PVYNTN was detected by RT-PCR and RFLP in all necrotic tubers and 66.7% of the asymptomatic tubers. Some tubers (15.8%) harvested from the infected plants were negative in RT-PCR targeting either P1 protein gene or NIb gene and showed neither external nor internal necrotic symptom. To my knowledge, this is the first evidence of the occurrence of PVYNTN isolates in field-grown tobacco plants in Canada. References: (1) J. H. Lorenzen et al. Plant Dis. 90:935, 2006. (2) R. Singh et al. Arch Virol. 153:1, 2008. (3) H. Xu et al. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 27:125, 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207