Experimental performance of a model reference adaptive flux observer based NFC for IM drive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model reference adaptive flux (MRAF) observer based neuro-fuzzy controller (NFC) for an induction motor (IM) drive. An improved observer model is developed based on a reference flux model and a closed-loop Gopinath model flux observer which combines current and voltage model flux observers. The d-axis reference flux linkage of the indirect field oriented control is provided by flux weakening method. Furthermore, a proportional-integral (PI) based flux controller is used to provide the compensation for the reference flux model by comparing the flux reference and the observed flux from Gopinath model flux observer. An improved self-tuned NFC is utilized as a speed controller for IM drive. The proposed NFC incorporates fuzzy logic laws with a five-layer artificial neural network (ANN) scheme. In the proposed NFC, parameters of the 4 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> layer are tuning online for the purpose of minimizing the square of the error. Furthermore, the design of normalized inputs makes the proposed NFC suitable for variant size of IM with a little adjusting. A complete simulation model for indirect field oriented control of IM incorporating the proposed MRAF observer based NFC is developed in Matlab/Simulink. The performances of the proposed IM drive is investigated extensively at different dynamic operating conditions such as step change in load, step change in change in speed, parameter variations, etc. The proposed IM drive is also implemented in real-time using DSP board DS1104 for a laboratory 1 HP IM. The performance of the proposed MRAF observer based NFC controller is found robust and potential candidate for high performance industrial drive applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".