A Study on Trend of Technology Development for Unmanned Combat Ground Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
지상무인 전투체계에서 요구되는 원천, 핵심기술은 해외 선진 국가들과의 치열한 경쟁이 예상된다. 따라서 주요 국가의 무인체계 기술개발현황을 분석하였으며, 분석 대상은 1998년부터 2008년까지 미국, 일본, 유럽, 캐나다, 이스라엘 등에 출원된 현황을 기준하였다. 주요 선진국의 특허맵과 전문가 의견을 수렴하여 국가별 기술 수준, 역점분야와 공백기술, 시장력 등을 분석하였으며, 앞으로 발전 가능성이 예상되는 기술과 우리나라가 중점 개발하여야할 분야 등을 제시하였다. The keen global competition is expected among foreign advanced nations for source, key technologies required by unmanned combat ground vehicle. Therefore, the trend of technologies for unmanned ground combat vehicle was analyzed in this research. It was based on the submitted patents from 1988 to 2008 in Korea, U.S.A, Japan, Europe, Canada and Israel. This analysis was focused on finding the technical level, the challenge area and breakthrough technologies and the growth of technologies of each nations considering opinions of experts. This report suggested the field of key technology development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".