La Cour spéciale pour la Sierra Leone et la portée de son héritage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La fermeture de la Cour spéciale pour la Sierra Leone a intensifié le débat sur l’impact de la Cour. La question de la portée de son héritage est ainsi d’une actualité brûlante. S’agissant d’un sujet tant juridique que politique, cet article fait le choix d’interroger la notion même d’héritage plutôt que d’évaluer ou de mesurer de manière empirique cet héritage. Une reconceptualisation du processus de legs est proposée pour mieux l’apprécier comme processus de construction continue d’héritages – au pluriel – avec une diversité d’acteurs. La Cour se présentant comme précurseur d’une approche institutionnelle, les héritages sont d’ores et déjà devenus des lieux de contestation sur la signification de la Cour pour la Sierra Leone, l’Afrique et la justice pénale internationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".