Design Synthesis of a Wave Energy Converter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A demonstration ocean wave energy project is planned for Hesquiaht Sound, British Columbia, Canada in 2010. This project is led by SyncWave Systems and involves the University of Victoria, Dynamic Systems Analysis Ltd. and Marinus Power. The design process for this demonstration wave energy converter (WEC) including site selection, linear dynamics, control system scheduling and non-linear dynamics modelling is presented. The WEC is a heaving point absorber that extracts energy through the relative motion between two axisymmetric bodies and utilizes an internally housed mechanical system with adjustable inertia characteristics for frequency response tuning. Site selection for the device was completed by using an established wave propagation model to translate off-shore sea conditions calculated from WAVEWATCHIII (WW3) into near-shore conditions. By analysis of the predicted near-shore conditions a suitable location with a frequently energetic sea state was chosen. The design process of the WEC consists of a linearized dynamics model to optimize the controller and a nonlinear dynamics model to analyze the mooring and hull components. The resulting unit effectively captures energy from the prevailing sea-states while ensuring adequate survival capability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it