MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039307655 · doi:10.1109/ic2e.2014.75

A Decentralized Autonomic Architecture for Performance Control in the Cloud

2014· article· en· W2039307655 on OpenAlex
Ian Gergin, Bradley Simmons, Marin Litoiu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceArchitectureDistributed computingAutonomic computingSet (abstract data type)Controller (irrigation)Aggregate (composite)Reference architectureService (business)Service levelComponent (thermodynamics)Software architectureOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a decentralized autonomic architecture for multi-tier applications deployed in cloud environments. The architecture maintains the application's service level objective at a predefined level and, implicitly, reduces the cost. The architecture uses a series of autonomic controllers, in which each controller independently regulates a tier of the application. The architecture utilizes feedback loops and implements Proportional, Integrative and Derivative control laws at each autonomic controller. A prototype is described and an initial set of experiments is conducted on a public commercial cloud. The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach at maintaining a service level objective through the decomposition of an application's aggregate performance into its set of discretely managed component tiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207