MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039308000 · doi:10.1177/154405910308200206

Functional Heterogeneity in the Superior Head of the Human Lateral Pterygoid

2003· article· en· W2039308000 on OpenAlexafffund
Intira Phanachet, Terry Whittle, K. Wanigaratne, Iven Klineberg, Barry J. Sessle, Greg M. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dental Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilAustralian Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAustralian Dental Research FoundationCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Sydney
KeywordsLateral pterygoid muscleAnatomyClosing (real estate)Head (geology)MedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activity of the superior head of the human lateral pterygoid muscle (SHLP) is controversial. Given the non-parallel alignment of some SHLP fibers, the SHLP may be capable of differential activation. The aims were to clarify SHLP activity patterns in relation to location within SHLP. In 18 subjects, SHLP single motor units were intramuscularly recorded at computer-tomography-verified sites during horizontal (e.g., protrusion) and vertical (e.g., opening) jaw tasks (recorded by a jaw-tracking device) and at resting postural jaw position. None of 92 units was active at the resting postural position. Medially located units (21) showed activity during contralateral movement, protrusion, and opening; 5 were also active on jaw closing. There was a significant association between unit location and the number of units active during vertical tasks (i.e., jaw closing and clenching). Analysis of the data suggests differential activation within SHLP and raises the possibility of functional heterogeneity within SHLP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dental ResearchSame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207