Sensitivity of the Human Binaural Cortical Steady State Response to Interaural Level Differences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Objectives: Periodic alternations of the interaural correlation of a noise stimulus evoke an auditory steady state response that can be measured at the scalp, providing an objective measure of binaural integration. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of interaural level differences on this steady state response. Design: Auditory steady state responses at 4 and 8 Hz were recorded to 4 Hz cycles of interaural correlation change of a Gaussian noise in normal-hearing listeners. Responses were recorded with symmetric presentation levels of 80, 60, and 40 dB SPL and with interaural asymmetries ranging from 10 to 40 dB, varying in 10-dB steps. Results: The 8 Hz response was sensitive to interaural level asymmetry and fell to 50% strength at an asymmetry of 18 dB, although the response was detectable to an asymmetry of 30 dB. A simultaneously present 4 Hz response showed no sensitivity to interaural level difference. Significant responses were recorded in all participants. Conclusions: The 8 Hz auditory steady state response to a 4 Hz change in noise interaural correlation might be useful as an objective measure of binaural integration in asymmetric hearing loss. Response amplitude is more negatively affected by small amounts of interaural asymmetry than by large reductions in overall presentation level. Periodic alternations of the interaural correlation of a noise stimulus evoke an auditory steady state response that can be measured at the scalp. Listeners were studied for the effects of an interaural level difference evoked by 4 Hz cycles of interaural correlation change. An 8 Hz response was sensitive to interaural level asymmetry, but a simultaneously present 4 Hz response showed no sensitivity to interaural level difference. These findings have implications for the use of the auditory steady state response as an objective measure of binaural integration in asymmetric hearing loss and treatment of it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".