MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039321173 · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181ec5d7a

Sensitivity of the Human Binaural Cortical Steady State Response to Interaural Level Differences

2010· article· en· W2039321173 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Massoud, Steven J. Aiken, Aaron J. Newman, Dennis P. Phillips, Manohar Bance

Bibliographic record

VenueEar and Hearing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinaural recordingStimulus (psychology)AudiologySteady state (chemistry)CorrelationSound localizationAsymmetryInteraural time differenceAcousticsNoise (video)MathematicsPsychologyPhysicsMedicineComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objectives: Periodic alternations of the interaural correlation of a noise stimulus evoke an auditory steady state response that can be measured at the scalp, providing an objective measure of binaural integration. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of interaural level differences on this steady state response. Design: Auditory steady state responses at 4 and 8 Hz were recorded to 4 Hz cycles of interaural correlation change of a Gaussian noise in normal-hearing listeners. Responses were recorded with symmetric presentation levels of 80, 60, and 40 dB SPL and with interaural asymmetries ranging from 10 to 40 dB, varying in 10-dB steps. Results: The 8 Hz response was sensitive to interaural level asymmetry and fell to 50% strength at an asymmetry of 18 dB, although the response was detectable to an asymmetry of 30 dB. A simultaneously present 4 Hz response showed no sensitivity to interaural level difference. Significant responses were recorded in all participants. Conclusions: The 8 Hz auditory steady state response to a 4 Hz change in noise interaural correlation might be useful as an objective measure of binaural integration in asymmetric hearing loss. Response amplitude is more negatively affected by small amounts of interaural asymmetry than by large reductions in overall presentation level. Periodic alternations of the interaural correlation of a noise stimulus evoke an auditory steady state response that can be measured at the scalp. Listeners were studied for the effects of an interaural level difference evoked by 4 Hz cycles of interaural correlation change. An 8 Hz response was sensitive to interaural level asymmetry, but a simultaneously present 4 Hz response showed no sensitivity to interaural level difference. These findings have implications for the use of the auditory steady state response as an objective measure of binaural integration in asymmetric hearing loss and treatment of it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEar and HearingSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207