Engineering geology characterization of lacustrine overconsolidated clays in an alpine area of Italy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study reports the main geotechnical characteristics of the Steggio Clay unit, a lacustrine sequence located in a valley of the Veneto Piedmont area (northern Italy). Analyzing the variations of overconsolidation pressure with depth, and the compressibility characteristics of natural, swelled, and reconstituted samples, one can hypothesize about the existence and influence of swelling processes on the stress history of the deposit. The yield pressures, determined by oedometric tests for the various lithostratigraphic units, are compared with the preconsolidation pressures deduced from the geological analysis, and a reduction in apparent preconsolidation pressures is evident in the upper layers. Comparing the natural water content of each stratigraphic unit with that of the overconsolidated and normally consolidated states, it can be seen that the same layers are softened. These phenomena could have been caused by swelling induced by erosion of the overlying deposits, sliding of glacial masses, and unloading due to deglaciation. The results of undrained consolidated triaxial compression tests indicate that the variations between the parameters of mechanical resistance of some lithological units can be attributed to the different values of the void index, Ivo, corresponding to the lithostatic in situ stress.Key words: overconsolidated clays, stress history, swelling, intrinsic characteristics, post-depositional processes, glaciation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".