Human urotensin-II enhances plasma extravasation in specific vascular districts in Wistar rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasma extravasation (PE) was measured in adult Wistar rats by injecting Evans blue dye (EB) (20 mg kg-1) intravenously in the absence or presence of human urotensin II (U-II) (0.1-10 nmol kg-1). A consistent increase of PE was observed in specific organs (e.g., aorta, from 28.1 +/- 2.4 to 74.6 +/- 3.6 micro g EB g-1 dry tissue; P < 0.001) after an administration of 4.0 nmol kg-1 (a preselected optimal dose) of U-II. The effects of U-II (4.0 nmol kg-1) were compared with those of endothelin-1 (ET-1) (1.0 nmol kg-1). In the thoracic aorta and pancreas, U-II was active, while ET-1 was not. The two agents were equivalent in the heart and kidney, whereas, in the duodenum, ET-1 was more active than U-II. Increases of plasma extravasation induced by U-II, but not by ET-1, were reduced after treatment with [Orn8]U-II (0.3 micromol kg-1). This latter antagonist did not show any significant residual agonistic activity in vivo in the rat. Other specific receptor antagonists for ET-1, such as BQ-123 (endothelin type A (ETA) receptor) and BQ-788 (endothelin type B (ETB) receptor), and for the platelet activating factor (PAF), such as BN50730, failed to modify the action of U-II. The present study is the first report describing the modulator roles of U-II on vascular permeability in specific organs. Moreover, the action of U-II appears specific, since it is independent of the ET-1 and PAF signalling pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".