Ethylene, free radicals and the transition between stable states in plant morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment with hydrogen peroxide has notable effects in the morphology of the root apex in Arabidopsis seedlings. The result was described as consisting in two aspects: first, a reduction in curvature values in the root profile. Second, alterations in size and shape of the cells in the root cap. Cells of the root cap were smaller and had higher circularity index (Fig. 1). The results of peroxide treatment were similar to alterations in the root apex of ethylene insensitive mutants and wild-type seedlings treated with ethylene inhibitors. This brings new evidence in favour of the association between ethylene and hydrogen peroxide signalling that was recently demonstrated in stomatal cells. Notable changes in morphology under peroxide treatment were previously reported in other biological systems (Fig. 2). In the following paragraphs we make emphasis on the need of an accurate analysis of morphology. This aspect has not received the attention required in biology, a discipline dominated by functional analysis. We suggest that the observed morphological characteristics in the root apex treated with peroxide may be the manifestation of global processes of adaptation in the organism. Alternative forms of roots grown in water or in peroxide are stable situations representing different global configurations that may have other (genomic, physiological) traits associated. Each form represents a different mode of adaptation to environmental change. The accurate description of morphology in organisms, with particular emphasis in model systems, and their variations under stress, is needed to identify and understand the basis of genomic organization and plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".