MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039402838 · doi:10.1002/gj.1186

Extensional development of the Fundy rift basin, southeastern Canada

2009· article· en· W2039402838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRiftGeologyHalf-grabenSeismologyInversion (geology)Structural basinFault (geology)UnconformityFault scarpPaleontologyBasin and range topographyEchelon formationRift zonePaleozoic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Fundy rift basin of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Canada, is part of the Eastern North American rift system that formed during the breakup of Pangaea. Integrated seismic‐reflection, field, digital‐elevation and aeromagnetic data indicate that the Fundy rift basin underwent two phases of deformation: syn‐rift extension followed by post‐rift basin inversion. Inversion significantly modified the geometries of the basin and its rift‐related structures. In this paper, we remove the effects of inversion to examine the basin's extensional development. The basin consists of three structural subbasins: the Fundy and Chignecto subbasins are bounded by low‐angle, NE‐striking faults; the Minas subbasin is bounded by E‐ to ENE‐striking faults that are steeply dipping at the surface and gently dipping at depth. Together, these linked faults form the border–fault system of the Fundy rift basin. Most major faults within the border–fault system originated as Palaeozoic contractional structures. All syn‐rift units imaged on seismic profiles thicken towards the border–fault system, reflecting extensional movement from Middle Triassic (and possibly Permian) through Early Jurassic time. Intra‐rift unconformities, observed on seismic profiles and in the field, indicate that uplift and erosion occurred, at least locally, during rifting. Based on seismic data alone, the displacement direction of the hanging wall of the border–fault system of the Fundy rift basin ranged from SW to SE during rifting. Field data (i.e. NE‐striking igneous dykes, sediment‐filled fissures and normal faults) indicate NW–SE extension during Early Jurassic time, supporting a SE‐displacement direction. With a SE‐displacement direction, the NE‐striking border–fault zones of the Fundy and Chignecto subbasins had predominantly normal dip slip during rifting, whereas the E‐striking border–fault zone of the Minas subbasin had oblique slip with left‐lateral and normal components. Sequential restorations of seismic‐reflection profiles (coupled with projections from onshore geology) show that the Fundy rift basin underwent 10–20 km of extension, most of which was accommodated by the border–fault system, and was considerably wider and deeper prior to basin inversion. Post‐rift deformation tilted the eastern side of the basin to the northwest/north, producing significant uplift and erosion. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it