Putative Role of Functional Interferon Regulatory Factor 5 (<i>IRF5</i>) Polymorphism in Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Korean Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: .Recent studies suggest that polymorphisms of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) are significantly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in several populations. The effect of IRF5 polymorphism on susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been investigated, and the results were inconsistent. We analyzed the genetic effects of IRF5 polymorphisms on RA in a Korean population. METHODS: Eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and 2 insertion-deletion polymorphisms in IRF5 were genotyped in 2183 subjects (1204 RA cases and 979 controls) using the TaqMan(R) method. The genetic effects of SNP on the risk of RA were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and shared epitope (SE), and we then performed conditional analysis by SE status and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody (Ab) status. Data from a Mantel-Haenszel metaanalysis of odds ratios (OR) were subsequently combined in a separate analysis with the results of the association of rs2004640 with RA from a previous study. RESULTS: Two of the IRF5 polymorphisms, CGGGGindel (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09-1.76, pcorr = 0.04) and rs2004640 (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, pcorr = 0.03), and one haplotype, including the rs2004640 and the CGGGGindel, ht3 (A-Del-T-C-del-A-T) (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.79, pcorr = 0.04) were significantly associated with an increased risk of RA. After stratification according to anti-CCP Ab and SE status, rs2004640 SNP was associated with the anti-CCP Ab-positive (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.15-1.88, pcorr = 0.01) or SE-positive group (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.09, pcorr = 0.03). A combined analysis including all 3 independent cohorts from the previous study revealed an association of the rs2004640 with RA (pooled OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.38, pooled p = 0.0031 in dominant model). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the IRF5 polymorphism is associated with genetic susceptibility to RA at least in a Korean population, and that it may contribute to disease susceptibility in SE-positive or anti-CCP Ab-positive patients with RA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".