MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel EEG Artifact in the Intensive Care Unit

2002· article· en· W2039483452 on OpenAlex
G. Bryan Young, Laszlo Osvath, Daniel Jones, Edward Socha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)London Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtifact (error)ElectroencephalographyHemoperfusionRhythmWaveformComputer scienceStimulus (psychology)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychologyMedicineInternal medicineCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe a novel EEG artifact in two patients whose records were otherwise suppressed. The saw-toothed waveform, containing 5.5- and 11-Hz rhythms, was induced as a movement artifact by a hemoperfusion machine connected to the patient. The artifact is highly characteristic, but could be easily misinterpreted as a cerebral rhythm if one is not aware of the entity. The artifact should be suspected when invariant, saw-toothed rhythms appear beyond the temporal and occipital lobes, and also contaminate the electrocardiographic channel. It can be proved by its disappearance on stopping and reemergence with starting the rotary pump action of the device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it