MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039506217 · doi:10.1080/0950236x.2014.993519

Neoliberalism and the limits of the human: Rawi Hage's<i>Cockroach</i>

2015· article· en· W2039506217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTextual Practice · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)Context (archaeology)HumanismSociologyPoliticsEnvironmental ethicsInclusion (mineral)Order (exchange)GovernmentalityBiopowerAnthropoceneState of exceptionEpistemologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawPhilosophyHistoryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What does it mean to be human in the context of the neoliberal political order? This article reads the contemporary terrain of theorization around embodiment and neoliberalism in order to argue that the deployment of the human has become evermore contingent in recent history. The article reads the ways in which the notion of the human comes into a state of crisis in Rawi Hage's novel Cockroach in order to understand the vulnerability of the human body in this context and to argue against a simple notion of humanistic inclusion as a solution to challenges to contemporary governance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it