Agricultural Revolution, Political Development, and Long-Run Economic Growth
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper argues that the more a ruling elite is dependent upon a small minority for the resources necessary to politically survive, the more likely it is to be predatory, Alternatively, the broader the group upon which the ruling elite depends for political survival, the less likely the elite will be predatory, and this is what is meant by political development. Thus, political development is necessary for long-run economic development and political development is more likely to evolve in the context of broad-based agricultural (rural) development. The experiences of Japan and Taiwan are used to illustrate these ideas. RÉSUMÉ Selon l'auteur, plus une elite dirigeante dépend d'une petite minorité pour les ressources nécessaires à sa survie politique, plus cette élite aura tendance à être prédatrice. À l'inverse, plus le groupe dont l'élite dirigeante dépend pour sa survie politique est large, moins cette élite aura tendance à être prkdatrice. C'est ce que l'on entend par le déeloppement politique. Par conséquent, le déeloppement politique est nécessaire au déeloppement économique à long terme et il se produit plus souvent duns un contexte de développement agricole (rural) à grande éhelle. Pour illustrer ces idées, l'auteur fait état de l'expérience du Japon et de Taïwan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it