Probing the Transition State Ensemble of a Protein Folding Reaction by Pressure-Dependent NMR Relaxation Dispersion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The F61A/A90G mutant of a redesigned form of apocytochrome b562 folds by an apparent two-state mechanism. We have used the pressure dependence of 15N NMR relaxation dispersion rate profiles to study the changes in volumetric parameters that accompany the folding reaction of this protein at 45 degrees C. The experiments were performed under conditions where the folding/unfolding equilibrium could be studied at each pressure without addition of denaturants. The exquisite sensitivity of the methodology to small changes in folding/unfolding rates facilitated the use of relatively low-pressure values (between 1 and 270 bar) so that pressure-induced changes to the unfolded state ensemble could be minimized. A volume change for unfolding of -81 mL/mol is measured (at 1 bar), a factor of 1.4 larger (in absolute value) than the volume difference between the transition state ensemble (TSE) and the unfolded state. Notably, the changes in the free energy difference between folded and unfolded states and in the activation free energy for folding were not linear with pressure. Thus, the difference in the isothermal compressibility upon unfolding (-0.11 mL mol(-1) bar(-1)) and, for the first time, the compressibility of the TSE relative to the unfolded state (0.15 mL mol(-1) bar(-1)) could be calculated. The results argue for a TSE that is collapsed but loosely packed relative to the folded state and significantly hydrated, suggesting that the release of water occurs after the rate-limiting step in protein folding. The notion of a collapsed and hydrated TSE is consistent with expectations based on earlier temperature-dependent folding studies, showing that the barrier to folding at 45 degrees C is entropic (Choy, W. Y.; Zhou, Z.; Bai, Y.; Kay, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5066-5072).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".