MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039586253 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.144424

Frustrated magnetism in the two-dimensional triangular lattice of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Li</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CoO</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2005· article· lv· W2039586253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersTRIUMFNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsMagnetismAntiferromagnetismPhysicsCondensed matter physicsMuon spin spectroscopyOrder (exchange)CrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetism of the simplest layered cobaltite ${\mathrm{Li}}_{x}{\mathrm{CoO}}_{2}$ with $x=1.0$, 0.95, and 0.7 has been investigated by positive muon spin rotation and relaxation $({\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}\mathrm{SR})$ spectroscopy together with magnetic susceptibility measurements, using polycrystalline samples in the temperature range between 300 and 1.8 K. Weak transverse field ${\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}\mathrm{SR}$ showed the appearance of magnetism below $\ensuremath{\sim}65\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}(={T}_{c}^{\text{on}})$ for the sample with $x=1.0$. The volume fraction of the magnetic phase at 1.8 K is determined to be $\ensuremath{\sim}20%$ for ${\mathrm{LiCoO}}_{2}$, strongly suggesting that the observed magnetism is not induced by impurities but is an intrinsic behavior. This indicates that either a charge disproportionation $(2{\mathrm{Co}}^{3+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{Co}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{Co}}^{4+})$, a spin state transition $({t}_{2g}^{6}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{t}_{2g}^{5}{e}_{g}^{1})$, or an appearance of magnetic ${\mathrm{Co}}^{3+}$ at surface occurs below 65 K. Zero field ${\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}\mathrm{SR}$ spectra of ${\mathrm{LiCoO}}_{2}$ consist mainly of a slow relaxing signal due to random fields even at 1.8 K plus a small amount of a fast relaxing signal and an oscillating component, implying the presence of an antiferromagnetic order, as in the case of ${\mathrm{Na}}_{x}{\mathrm{CoO}}_{2}$ with $x\ensuremath{\geqslant}0.75$. For Li-deficient ${\mathrm{Li}}_{x}{\mathrm{CoO}}_{2}$ samples, ${T}_{c}^{\text{on}}$ decreases with decreasing $x$ from 50 K for $x=0.95$ to 25 K for $x=0.7$. The volume fraction of the magnetic phase is however almost independent of $x$ and is estimated as 20% at 1.8 K, but no oscillations were observed in the zero field spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it