MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1-S2.50 Anal non-L Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men who have sex with men, at l'Actuel, Montreal, Quebec

2011· article· en· W2039594588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louise Charest, Rachel Thomas, Benoît Trottier, Michel Boissonnault, D Legault, Danièle Longpré, Jason Szabo, Pierre-Jean Maziade, Nimâ Machouf

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChlamydia trachomatisGynecologyChlamydiaMen who have sex with menMale HomosexualityVirologySyphilisHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Immunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few cases of sexually transmitted Hepatitis C infection (HCV) in men who have sex with men (MSM) had been reported in the literature. Background The incidence of genital infection from non-L Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is increasing in the province of Quebec. Traditionally it was more prevalent in young women. In the last few years, CT infection has emerged in men who have sex with men (MSM) group. The objective of this study was to describe anal non-L CT infection in MSM in an HIV-STI clinic in a large urban setting. Methods Retrospective study of anal non-L CT cases diagnosed at Clinique l'Actuel in 2010. We collected information on age at diagnosis, HIV status, CT serovars, symptoms, mode of transmission and concomitant presence of CT in urine. An anal swab specimen was collected with a TAAN test (BD Probe Tec TM). Results From 2006 to 2009, we diagnosed respectively 42, 58, 82 and 118 anal non-L CT infection in MSM. In 2010, we diagnosed 154 different anal non-L CT infections in 152 MSM. Patient's age at diagnosis was 33 years (IQR—25−38) from 18 to 70 years. 28% were HIV+ at time of diagnosis. Anal infection was primarily caused by serovars J (35%), G (31%), D (23%), E (10%), F (1%) and C (1%). Among HIV patients the serovars was predominantly J (46%), D (30%) and G (24%). But this difference was not statistically significant. Anal non-L CT infection was detected in asymptomatic patients while screening in 54% of case. 7% of MSM had no symptom but consulted because they were notified by a sexual partner. 39% had symptoms—proctitis (26%), urethritis (11%) or symptom of other STI including syphilis and HIV primary infection (2%). Mode of transmission for the anal infection was not specifically specified in the file of the patients, but 88% reported anal unprotected penetration in the past year, 12 % did not report anal penetration but had mouth to anus contact (rimming) or friction from penis to anus. One patient reports sharing anal toys. Urine CT was positive in 18% of MSM, so those MSM had two infected sites. Conclusion Given the high rate of positive results, MSM should be screen with a TAAN test for anal CT infection. This screening should be included in the regular follow-up of HIV patients. MSM community should be aware of this emerging infection. Public health authority should focus on developing and promoting new guidelines of screening, access to validated test with identification of serovars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207