MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2039604282 · doi:10.1007/bf03018257

In collaboration with the Canadian Critical Care Society, the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia is proud to publish the best posters presented at the Toronto Critical Care Medicine Symposium 2003 (Adult and Pediatric) held in Toronto, Ontario, October 30 – November 1, 2003

2004· article· en· W2039604282 on OpenAlexaffabout
Conán McCaul, Patrick J. McNamara, Doreen Engelberts, Gregory J. Wilson, Alex Romaschn, Andrew N. Redington, Brian P. Kavanagh, Karen E. A. Burns, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Maureen O. Meade, G. Scott Milencoff, Christian Rabbat, Zakorka Povosky, Alison Fox‐Robichaud, François Marquis, David Bracco, Stephane Lamarre, Rédouane Bouali, Brent W. Winston, Huang Yong, Connie Mowat, David A. Zygun, L. A. Steiner, Alexander Johnston, Peter J. Hutchinson, P. G. Al-Rawi, Dale A. Chatfield, Pamela Kirkpatrick, David Menon, Arun Kumar Gupta, Andrew J. W. Samis, Daren K. Heyland, John Drover

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryVictoria HospitalHôtel-Dieu de MontréalHealth Sciences CentreQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicationMedicineLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→