MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetic resonance imaging predicts neuropathology from soman-mediated seizures in the rodent

2001· article· en· W2039631898 on OpenAlexaff
Yusuf A. Bhagat, Andr Obenaus, Murray G. Hamilton, Edward J. Kendall

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsDepartment of National DefenceUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomanNeuropathologyHippocampusPiriform cortexNeuroscienceThalamusStatus epilepticusEntorhinal cortexPathologyMedicineChemistryEpilepsyNuclear magnetic resonancePsychologyAcetylcholinesterasePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intoxication by the organophosphate compound soman causes prolonged seizures that lead to neuropathology in the brain. This MRI-based study describes the temporal and spatial evolution of brain pathology that follows soman-induced convulsions. We observed significant decreases in apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC; 23% below control) of the hippocampus and thalamus by 12 h after soman treatment. The ADC then returned to near normal values in all regions at 24 h but declined again during the next 7 days. These data suggest that the initial cellular degradation may be resolved but is ultimately followed by regional cellular remodeling. T2 relaxation values declined significantly at 12 h (37% decrease) returning to near normal values by 24 h. These data lend detail to the model suggesting that injured tissues experience an edematous influx that is resolved by 24 h. The imaging data was fully supported by histopathological comparisons where moderate cell loss and swelling within the hippocampus and piriform cortex was observed. This is the first report providing excellenttemporal and spatial resolution of emerging soman-mediated, seizure-induced neuropathology using MRI with histological correlation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207