MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039640418 · doi:10.1115/imece2002-32828

Flow Induced Vibration and Fretting Wear: An Integrated Approach

2002· article· en· W2039640418 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Dmitry V. Paramonov, S. J. King, Michael Y. Young, Roger Lu

Bibliographic record

Venue5th International Symposium on Fluid Structure Interaction, Aeroelasticity, and Flow Induced Vibration and Noise · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsFrettingVibrationCladding (metalworking)Nuclear fuelVortex-induced vibrationNuclear engineeringFretting wearMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringFlow (mathematics)Structural engineeringEngineeringMechanicsMetallurgyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel assemblies are exposed to severe thermal, mechanical and radiation loads during operation. Global core and local fuel assembly flow fields typically result in fuel rod vibration. Under certain conditions, this vibration, when coupled with other factors, might result in excessive cladding fretting wear. This phenomenon is of the concern for nuclear fuel designers, especially in light of the need for higher burnup, longer cycle lengths, and operational safety margins in fuel designs. Understanding of (1) the fretting wear margins for a particular nuclear fuel design, (2) the probability of a fuel assembly exposed to a particular set of thermal, mechanical, flow and radiation conditions being at risk of excessive wear, and (3) the factors affecting fretting wear resistance, are important in order to better guide design, testing, and operational flexibility. In this paper, an integrated method to estimate fretting margin of nuclear fuel is presented, including its formulation, benchmark against experimental data and example application to in-core conditions. The major features of the method are as follows: • flow and rod vibration response are coupled through a linear structural analysis model, • flow field is determined using a sub-channel thermal-hydraulic code, • wear progression is treated as a time-dependent process, through taking into account impact of resulting rod-to-support clearance, • a possibility of a fluid-elastic instability is accounted for. Supporting data on basic wear mechanisms, flow field and fuel assembly fretting wear behavior obtained at a number of experimental facilities at Westinghouse Electric Company and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited are also presented. These facility include: • VIPER hydraulic test loop data where vibration response and wear are measured under prototypical flow conditions, and • autoclave fretting-wear machine steam employed to determine fretting-wear coefficients of fuel rod and grid-support designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue5th International Symposium on Fluid Structure Interaction, Aeroelasticity, and Flow Induced Vibration and NoiseSame topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207