MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039665647 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2013.6825070

Distributed resource allocation for self-organizing small cell networks: An evolutionary game approach

2013· article· en· W2039665647 on OpenAlexaff
Prabodini Semasinghe, Kun Zhu, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationEvolutionary game theoryDistributed computingReplicator equationGame theorySmall cellResource management (computing)Resource (disambiguation)Evolutionarily stable strategyHeterogeneous networkWireless networkMathematical optimizationWirelessCellular networkComputer networkMathematical economicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future wireless networks are expected to be highly heterogeneous with the co-existence of macrocells and a large number of small cells. In this case, centralized control and manual intervention will be highly inefficient. Therefore, self organization and distributed resource allocation are of paramount importance for the successful deployment of small cell networks. In this work, we propose an evolutionary game theory (EGT)-based distributed resource allocation scheme for small cell networks. EGT is a suitable tool to address the self organized small cell resource allocation problem since it allows the players with bounded rationality to make individual decisions and learn from the environment for attaining the equilibrium with the minimum information exchange. Also, fairness can be provided. Specifically, we show how EGT can be used for subcarrier and power allocation of small cell networks. Replicator dynamics is used to model the strategy adaptation process of the small cell base stations and the evolutionary equilibrium is obtained as the solution. Numerical results show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207