MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039674529 · doi:10.1109/bsc.2010.5472923

Periodic GATE Optimization (PGO) in Long-Reach Passive Optical Networks

2010· article· en· W2039674529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollingComputer scienceComputer networkQueuePassive optical networkPropagation delayNetwork packetBandwidth allocationThread (computing)Bandwidth (computing)Dynamic bandwidth allocationReal-time computingWavelength-division multiplexingPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a bandwidth allocation service for using the Multi-Point Control Protocol (MPCP) in Long-Reach Passive Optical Networks. We modify and enhance the previously proposed Multi-Thread Polling and call it Periodic GATE Optimization (PGO). The challenge in Long-Reach PON is the long distance between the OLT and the ONUs which is 100 km here. Polling each ONU with multiple threads running in parallel is adopted from multi-thread polling. PGO periodically takes the snapshot of the network and forms an ILP model to estimate the appropriate GATE credits of the overloaded ONUs for the next period. The simulation results show that PGO leads to a lower delay and shorter queue length while keeping the packet loss at a low level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207