MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039680188 · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/13/10/313

High-performance digital control system for scanning tunnelling microscopy

2002· article· en· W2039680188 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Boudreau, Bruno Paillard, P. Rowntree

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareDigital signal processingDetectorMicroscopeDigital controlCompensation (psychology)Electronic engineeringComputer hardwareOpticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a flexible, completely digital, scanning tunnelling microscope developed around a fixed-point (TMS320C542) digital signal processor. During the development special attention has been paid to the cost of the instrument, without limiting its performance, and in some regards enhancing it. The instrument has been developed and tested in the air, at room temperature, and atomic resolution has been achieved. Its software provides a maximum of support to the user. The tip approach is completely automated. The control parameters can be adjusted based on an on-line identification and off-line (in simulation) optimization. This technique is completely integrated to the control software. It greatly simplifies the parameter optimization, and completely eliminates the risk of collision between the tip and the sample during the optimization. The scanning of the image and control of the tunnelling current are implemented in software by the DSP. This allows the precise identification and real-time compensation of the capacitive coupling between the scan tube electrodes and the current detector. The image analysis and processing software allows slope compensation, as well as the presentation of differential image, two-dimensional FFT and three-dimensional image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207