MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039690744 · doi:10.7202/1014693ar

Some Motets in Honour of St Joseph in the Archives of the Ursulines of Québec

2013· article· en· W2039690744 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Erich Schwandt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian University Music Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian University Music Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourArtMusicalPhilosophyArt historyLiteratureHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a handful of motets in honour of one of New France's most important patrons—St Joseph—preserved at the Archives of the Ursulines of Québec. This group of eight motets has formed the basis of speculation about the musical gifts of Père René Ménard and Mère Marie de St Joseph. Both of them are mentioned in 1640 as being capable musicians, but both were dead by the middle of the seventeenth century. In this article the St Joseph motets are examined to see if there is any basis for connecting any of the music to either person. Unfortunately, all of the music is stylistically much too late to have been composed by Père Ménard, or to have been assembled or copied by Mère de St Joseph. Solum nomen super est.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian University Music ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207