MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039759783 · doi:10.1159/000237159

Effect of in vivo and in vitro Lovastatin Treatment on Mast Cell Activation

2009· article· en· W2039759783 on OpenAlexaff
Colette Roche, E.R. Trimble, Madeleine Ennis

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vivoLovastatinImmunologyMast cellIn vitroMedicineBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistryCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor lovastatin is used to treat hyperlipidaemia. This agent prevents the isoprenylation of some proteins involved in signal transduction processes and inhibits IgE-receptor-linked mediator release from RBL-2H3 cells. In this study the effect of in vivo and in vitro administration of lovastatin on histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells was examined. Lovastatin (4 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) inhibited histamine release induced by concanavalin A (con A) from rat peritoneal mast cells of Hooded-Lister rats and both homozygous lean and obese Zucker rats. In contrast, release induced by antirat IgE (anti-IgE) was only significantly inhibited in cells derived from Hooded-Lister rats and that induced by compound 48/80 was not altered. Lovastatin (20 microM, 24 h, in vitro) caused a significant inhibition of the subsequent histamine release to con A, anti-IgE and compound 48/80 but not to the calcium ionophore A 23187. It is important to determine whether such inhibitory effects are also observed after the chronic, clinical administration of lovastatin and other HMG CoA reductase inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207